|
41#

樓主 |
發(fā)表于 2015-10-8 02:47:02
|
只看該作者
本帖最后由 aysuio 于 2015-10-8 03:27 編輯 0 @% U7 Y& n* N* r
ValleyViews 發(fā)表于 2015-10-8 02:22 ![]()
! P9 t: D+ x- t7 T四海之內(nèi)皆兄弟也,。
6 {- {6 t% r" V5 y0 n: Q9 HTalking about your explanation, I think that every sent ... 8 m( i, K8 N, `! G) Y: e, C
大俠,,多謝跟我討論這個問題,。:D 小弟聯(lián)系方式已經(jīng)站內(nèi)信PM大俠 % T4 j7 k( M9 V
% C! [6 B6 D. r: s
As for the problem of line element, I still consider it as a 2D element. I may misunderstand something. I will appreciate your instruction if you can give me more explanation about it.1 t1 y T+ T& p3 a# A
1 W3 P6 H/ h4 N/ V, H1 O. YI just got an idea about this problem. Did you want to tell me that the line elements measured in the actual components can be torqued or twisted, so they may have 3 dimensions? |
|