|
本帖最后由 ValleyViews 于 2015-10-8 17:35 編輯
' I% p8 n7 ~7 ^( J, q/ Haysuio 發(fā)表于 2015-10-8 02:47
) v* B* F# Q# ?" x3 w1 a1 |8 b大俠,多謝跟我討論這個問題,。:D 小弟聯(lián)系方式已經(jīng)站內(nèi)信PM大俠
/ G4 E7 n0 A6 L+ w. A: ~As for the problem of line eleme ...
2 c6 r8 [' w8 \& q* z+ P我個人很喜歡這個帖子,,其問題本身的重要性暫時可以超過其結(jié)論,。還希望樓主大俠幫助我和大家共同學(xué)習(xí)提高。( A/ n* M; D& ~
. |) X4 I9 g0 |: |9 _Put it in this way, one single line element in a specified view could be considered as a 2d line, but multiple line elements in same view and in certain interval can establish a cluster of lines that can be considered as a kind of 3d image. Furthermore, multiple cross line elements in front view and side view can set up a net construction image that will be able to describe the flatness well enough. That's why some persons think that the new version Y14.5 would regulate the cross views straightness equal to flatness of a planar surface. |
|